RESUMO
Although natural populations are typically subjected to multiple stressors, most past research has focused on single-stressor and two-stressor interactions, with little attention paid to higher-order interactions among three or more stressors. However, higher-order interactions increasingly appear to be widespread. Consequently, we used a recently introduced and improved framework to re-analyze higher-order ecological interactions. We conducted a literature review of the last 100 years (1920-2020) and reanalyzed 142 ecological three-stressor interactions on species' populations from 38 published papers; the vast majority of these studies were from the past 10 years. We found that 95.8 % (n = 136) of the three-stressor combinations had either not been categorized before or resulted in different interactions than previously reported. We also found substantial levels of emergent properties-interactions that are not due to strong pairwise interactions within the combination but rather uniquely due to all three stressors being combined. Calculating net interactions-the overall accounting for all possible interactions within a combination including the emergent and all pairwise interactions-we found that the most prevalent interaction type is antagonism, corresponding to a smaller than expected effect based on single stressor effects. In contrast, for emergent interactions, the most prevalent interaction type is synergistic, resulting in a larger than expected effect based on single stressor effects. Additionally, we found that hidden suppressive interactions-where a pairwise interaction is suppressed by a third stressor-are found in the majority of combinations (74 %). Collectively, understanding multiple stressor interactions through applying an appropriate framework is crucial for answering fundamental questions in ecology and has implications for conservation biology and population management. Crucially, identifying emergent properties can reveal hidden suppressive interactions that could be particularly important for the ecological management of at-risk populations.
RESUMO
Understanding how stressors combine to affect population abundances and trajectories is a fundamental ecological problem with increasingly important implications worldwide. Generalisations about interactions among stressors are challenging due to different categorisation methods and how stressors vary across species and systems. Here, we propose using a newly introduced framework to analyse data from the last 25 years on ecological stressor interactions, for example combined effects of temperature, salinity and nutrients on population survival and growth. We contrast our results with the most commonly used existing method - analysis of variance (ANOVA) - and show that ANOVA assumptions are often violated and have inherent limitations for detecting interactions. Moreover, we argue that rescaling - examining relative rather than absolute responses - is critical for ensuring that any interaction measure is independent of the strength of single-stressor effects. In contrast, non-rescaled measures - like ANOVA - find fewer interactions when single-stressor effects are weak. After re-examining 840 two-stressor combinations, we conclude that antagonism and additivity are the most frequent interaction types, in strong contrast to previous reports that synergy dominates yet supportive of more recent studies that find more antagonism. Consequently, measuring and re-assessing the frequency of stressor interaction types is imperative for a better understanding of how stressors affect populations.
